Optical and electrical properties of InGaZnON thin films
Yao Jian Ke, Ye Fan, Fan Ping
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Thin Films and Applications, College of Physics and Energy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: yefan@szu.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61674107), Shenzhen Key Lab Fund, China (Grant No. ZDSYS 20170228105421966), and Science and Technology Plan of Shenzhen, China (Grant No. JCYJ20170302150335518).

Abstract

The substrate temperature (Ts) and N2 partial pressure (PN2) dependent optical and electrical properties of sputtered InGaZnON thin films are studied. With the increased Ts and PN2, the thin film becomes more crystallized and nitrified. The Hall mobility, free carrier concentration (Ne), and electrical conductivity increase with the lowered interfacial potential barrier during crystal growing. The photoluminescence (PL) intensity decreases with the increased Ne. The band gap (Eg) narrows and the linear refractive index (n1) increases with the increasing concentration of N in the thin films. The Stokes shift between the PL peak and absorption edge decreases with Eg. The n1, dispersion energy, average oscillator wavelength, and oscillator length strength all increase with n1. The single oscillator energy decreases with n1. The nonlinear refractive index and third order optical susceptibility increase with n1. The Seebeck coefficient, electron effective mass, mean free path, scattering time, and plasma energy are all Ne dependent.

1. Introduction

The InGaZnON (IGZON) thin films are now researched enormously as the active[13] or passivation[4] layers for thin film transistors to improve the stability.[5] The linear dispersive optical constants of IGZON thin films which are rarely studied till now are important to determine the sub-gap states in the thin films.[68] The structure of the crystalline IGZO thin film[9] is like that of the crystalline ZnO thin film which has non-centro symmetric structure with remarkable nonlinear optical response.[10,11] Generally, the third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility (χ(3)) and nonlinear refractive index (n2) increase with linear refractive index (n1).[12] The IGZO thin films have larger n1 than the ZnO thin films,[8] indicating the better nonlinear optical response of the IGZO thin films. However, there are few experimental studies for the nonlinear optical properties of the IGZO thin films.[13] The nonlinear optical properties can also be theoretically investigated by the spectroscopy methods.[12,14,15] However, to our knowledge, there are none theoretical calculations done on the nonlinear optical properties of IGZO based thin films till now.

For accurate characterizing the electrical transport properties of the IGZON thin films, besides the free carrier concentration (Ne), Hall mobility (µ), and electrical conductivity (σ), the effective mass of free carriers ()[16] and scattering time (τ)[17] should be determined together, but there are few related reports for the IGZON thin films. In this work, and τ for the IGZON thin films are extracted using the Seebeck coefficients S.

The substrate temperatures (Ts)[8,18] and N2 partial pressures (PN2)[1,7] during sputtering are crucial parameters determining the structure, composition, optical and electrical properties of thin films. Therefore, in this work, the Ts and PN2 dependent structure, composition, and optical and electrical properties of the IGZON thin films are investigated.

2. Experiment

The IGZON thin films were deposited by sputtering from an InGaZnO4 target in diameter of 60 mm and thickness of 5 mm with the base pressure of 9.0 × 10−4 Pa and the working pressure of 0.5 Pa. The IGZON1 to IGZON3 thin films were grown under the conditions of Ar : N2 : O2 flow rates of 40 : 5 : 5 sccm, RF power of 200 W, and Ts of room temperature (RT), 300°C, and 400°C, respectively. And the IGZON4 to IGZON6 thin films were grown under the conditions of Ar : N2 : O2 flow rates of 40 : 10 : 0 sccm, RF power of 200 W, and Ts of RT, 300°C, and 400°C, respectively. All the thin films have the thickness of ∼ 350 nm.

The structures of the thin films were studied by a Rigaku x-ray diffraction (XRD) meter. Cu radiation at the wavelength of 0.15418 nm was used as the x-ray source. The surface morphologies of the thin films were studied by a ZEISS Gemini scanning electron microscope (SEM). The surface chemical states of the thin films were characterized by a Thermo ESCALAB 250 x-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) with a mono-chromate Al x-ray source of energy 1486.6 eV and x-ray spot size of 500 µm. The test was taken at the chamber pressure of 10 mbar. The XPS spectra were collected under the condition with pass energy of 20 eV and 0.05 eV/step for high-resolution scan. The low-energy electron flood gun with voltage of 3 V and current of 200 µA was applied to compensate the charging effects for the poor conductivity of the samples. The spectra were calibrated using the absorbed C 1s peak at 284.8 eV and fitted by Avantage software with Gaussian–Lorenzian curve with the shape of all peaks assumed to be 80% Gaussian and 20% Lorentzian. A smart mode was used to calculate the background. A Lambda 900 spectrometer was used to measure the transmittance of the thin films. To examine the defect states in the samples, the photoluminescence (PL, Edinburgh instrument, M300 Monochromator, Xe 900) spectroscopy was carried out at RT. To determine the optical constants and thickness of the thin films, the Spectroscopic ellipsometer (SE, Semilab GES5-E) was used. The carrier transportation properties and S of the thin films were obtained by a Hall system using the van der Pauw configuration (HMS 2000) and an S measuring apparatus (ZEM-3) at RT.

3. Results and discussion

The Ts during deposition is a crucial process parameter which can determine the growth of crystalline IGZO (CIGZO) based thin films. The C-IGZO thin films usually appear at optimal Ts around 300°C.[18] The IGZON thin films have minor N doping and therefore are still mainly IGZO based with similar texture and growth condition. Figure 1 and Table 1 show the XRD patterns and diffraction peaks parameters of the IGZON thin films. All thin films have the C-axis aligned crystal structure with (009) peak at 34°.[18] The (009) diffraction peak refers to InGaZnO4 with hexagonal crystalline phase and R-3m (166) space-group with unit cell 3.295 × 3.295 × 26.07 〈90.0° × 90.0° × 120.0°〉 referred from PDF#38-1104 crystallographic card. The (009) peak of the crystalline thin films indicates the high degree of crystallinity exhibited by domains oriented perpendicular to the substrate. These lattice planes correspond to the alternating layers of indium oxide and gallium/zinc oxide in the unit cell. The crystal grain size (G) of the thin films is calculated by G = 0.89λ/(Bcosθ), where λ is the wavelength of the x-ray (0.15418 nm), θ is the diffraction angle, and B is the full width at half-maximum of the crystal plane. The peak intensity and G slightly increase with Ts at both PN2, indicating the growing of the thin film crystal. With the increase of Ts, the mobility of atoms adsorbed on the surface of the substrate increases, therefore the deposited thin film has improved crystalline and packing density. Figure 2 shows the surface morphologies of the thin films. All thin films have nano-crystalline structures. The grain size increases with the increased Ts and PN2 during deposition. The results are consistent with the XRD results in Fig. 1. The increased PN2 also increases G of the thin films as revealed by comparing IGZON4 to IGZON6 with IGZON1 to IGZON3 thin films.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of IGZON thin films deposited with increased Ts from RT to 400 °C at PN2 of (a) 10% and (b) 20%.
Fig. 2. The SEM surface morphologies with 105 magnification of the IGZON thin films deposited at (a) Ts of RT, PN2 of 10%; (b) Ts of 300 °C, PN2 of 10%; (c) Ts of 400 °C, PN2 of 10%; (d) Ts of RT, PN2 of 20%; (e) Ts of 300 °C, PN2 of 20%; (f) Ts of 400 °C, PN2 of 20%.
Table 1.

The d, 2θ, B, and I of the IGZO (009) peaks and G of the IGZON thin films.

.
Table 2.

Optical and dispersion energy parameters for IGZON thin films.

.

The XPS spectra of O 1s and N 1s are shown in Fig. 3. The Gaussian fitting is used for fitting the combined O 1s peaks. The resulting sub-peaks at the binding energies of 530.3 eV, 530.9 eV, and 533.2 eV are attributed to O2− surrounded by metal atoms, oxygen vacancies (VO), and OH−1 impurities, respectively, at Figs. 3(a) and 3(b).[2] The signals of Ga Auger at 396.7 eV and Ga–N bonds at 397.8 eV are observed in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d).[2] The atomic ratios of VO and N are calculated. It can be found that the concentration of VO (CVO, at.%) decreases with Ts at PN2 of 10% (Fig. 3(a)) due to the increased oxidation at higher Ts. At PN2 of 20% (Fig. 3(d)), with the increased Ts, the nitridation is slightly increased. With the concentration of N (CN, at.%) slightly increased with the increase of Ts, CVO also increases, which indicates the less oxidation than nitridation in the thin films, the less oxidation is also due to the oxygen escaping by the M–O bonds breaking during the deposition at higher temperature. The CN slightly increases with Ts and PN2 by the increased nitridation at higher Ts and PN2. At the same Ts, by comparing IGZON1 with IGZON4, IGZON2 with IGZON5, and IGZON3 with IGZON6, the thin films have larger CN and CVO by the slightly increased nitridation and decreased oxidation with the increased PN2.

Fig. 3. The O 1s XPS spectra of IGZON thin films deposited at (a) PN2 of 10% and Ts of RT, 300 °C, and 400 °C; (b) PN2 of 20% and Ts of RT, 300 °C, and 400 °C. N 1s XPS spectra of IGZON thin films deposited at (c) PN2 of 10% and Ts of RT, 300 °C, and 400 °C; (d) PN2 of 20% and Ts of RT, 300 °C, and 400 °C.

The stokes shifts between the RTPL spectra excited by 325 nm laser and the absorption coefficients are shown in Fig. 4. The optical absorption coefficient α is defined as[19]

Fig. 4. The stokes shift between RTPL and absorption spectra for IGZON thin films deposited at Ts of RT, 300 °C, 400 °C and (a) PN2 of 10% or (b) PN2 of 20%.

where T is the transmittance, R is the reflectance measured by the spectrometer as shown in Fig. 6, and d is the thickness of the thin film. The thin films exhibit broad and asymmetric PL spectra extended from UV to visible region with two peaks centered at 405 nm (3.06 eV) and 437 nm (2.84 eV).[20] The main violet emission peak centered at 3.06 eV is attributed to the electron transition from conduction band tail states to valence band tail states.[20] The minor blue emission at 2.84 eV is ascribed to the electron transition from interstitial to vacancy zincs. The PL intensity of the near-band-edge (NBE) emission strongly depends on the free carrier concentration (Ne) in the thin films. All IGZON thin films are n-type semiconductor. The Ne in the thin films increases with Ts and PN2 during deposition as seen in Fig. 5(a), which is due to the reduced crystal interfacial barriers with the increased size of the crystal grains in the thin films. As Ne increases, the PL intensity at 405 nm peak decreases. The PL and absorption spectra are compared. Between the two spectra, there exists a Stokes shift which is related to many effects such as electron–phonon coupling, lattice distortions, and interface and point defects.[21] The decrease of the Stokes shift as listed in Table 2 is ascribed to the narrowing of the band gap (Eg) as seen later in Figs. 7(g) and 7(h).

Fig. 5. The relation of (a) electrical conductivity (σ), Hall mobility (µ), (b) Seebeck coefficients (S), effective electron mass (), (c) free electron mean path (le), and scattering time (τ) with Ne.
Fig. 6. The transmittance and reflectance spectra of IGZON thin films deposited at Ts of RT, 300 °C, 400 °C and (a) PN2 of 10% or (b) PN2 of 20%.
Fig. 7. (a), (b) Linear refractive index (n1); (c), (d) Cole–Cole plots of dielectric functions; (e), (f) absorption coefficients (α); (g), (h) band gap (Eg); and (i) relation of plasma energy (Ep) with Ne for IGZON thin films.

The measured σ, µ, and S of the thin films are shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b). It is found that the Ts and PN2 have substantial influences on the charge transportation properties. The σ and µ increase with Ts and PN2 for the reduced interfacial crystal barrier by the increased crystalline size. The S depends on the temperature and electron effective mass () at the Fermi level and Ne as[22]

where kB is the Boltzmann constant, q is the electron charge, and h is the Plank constant. All thin films have negative S at RT, indicating the n-type conductivity. The S increases with Ne obeying well the relation (3), from which can be calculated as shown in Fig. 5(b). For the IGZO thin film with Ne of 3.5 × 1020 cm−3, the is calculated to be 0.30 , where is the static mass of electron.[23] The increases with Ne for the non-parabolicity of the conduction band, which shows the validity of our result. For accurate characterizing the transportation properties, the free electron mean path (le) and scattering time (τ) are calculated by[24,25]

where µ is the Hall mobility. The results are shown in Fig. 5(c). The smaller le than the crystal grain size in Table 1 indicates that the grain boundaries have no significant effects on the electrical transport properties. The le and τ are both Ne and µ co-dependent.

Figure 6 shows the transmittance and reflectance spectra of the IGZON thin films. All thin films are transparent in the visible region. The transmittance slightly decreases with Ts in the infrared region by free carrier absorption with the increased Ne.

The linear refractive index and dielectric constants are fitted by the SE method based on Cauchy and Drude models.[23] Figures 7(a) and 7(b) show that n1 increases with Ts and PN2. There are two mechanics for the increase of n1. One is the increased crystal quality and packing density with the increased mobility of atoms adsorbed on the surface of the substrate at higher Ts. The other is the increased polarizability by N doping for the larger atomic radius of N than that of O.

The dispersion and absorption of dielectrics are represented by the empirical formula[26,27]

where ε* is the complex dielectric constant, ε0 and ε are the static and high frequency dielectric constants, ω equals 2π times the frequency, and τ0 is the generalized relaxation time. The parameter α can assume values between 0 and 1, the former giving the result of Debye for polar dielectrics. Figures 7(c) and 7(d) show the calculated real and imaginary dielectric constants (ε1 and ε2), that is the Cole–Cole plots, from which ε is determined at the interception of the real axis.

The onset of free carrier absorption is given by the plasma energy[28]

Figure 7(i) shows that Ep increases with Ne. It is known that the exponential optical energy dependence of α in the vicinity of the band gap can be described by[29]

where E is the photon energy and Eu is the Urbach energy related to the joint density of states determined by both conduction and valence band tail states. The extracted Eu is shown in Figs. 7(e) and 7(f). By assuming the parabolic densities of band states within IGZON, Eg is extracted by the Tauc method[30]

where B is the slope. In Figs. 7(g) and 7(h), it is found that Eg is narrowed with the increase of Ts and PN2 during deposition for the IGZON thin films. The increases of Ts and PN2 during deposition have increased CN in the IGZON thin films as seen in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d). As discussed by Ryu, with the increased CN in thin films, the band gap decreases from 3.4 eV, 1.3 eV to 1.1 eV for ZnO, ZnON, and Zn2N3 thin films, respectively, which is mainly due to the N states in the valence band.[31] Therefore, in the IGZON thin films with the increase of CN, Eg is narrowed. Although the free carrier concentration in the IGZON thin films is increased with the increase of Ts and PN2 during deposition as seen in Fig. 5(a). The band gap will widen with the increase of Ne due to the Burstein–Moss (BM) effect.[32] The electron–electron and electron–ion scatterings will also narrow the band gap. Here, the band gap narrowing by the increase of CN in the thin films and by the electron–electron and electron–ion scatterings may be larger than the band gap widening by the BM effect. Therefore, for the IGZON thin films, with the increase of Ts and PN2 during deposition, Eg is narrowed.

The spectral dependent linear refractive index dispersion can be evaluated by the single-effective-oscillator model proposed by Wemple-Didomenico.[33] The n1 of thin films can be related with oscillator energy (Eo) and dispersion energy (Ed) by[33]

where is the photon energy, Eo and Ed are the single oscillator constants. Eo is the average excitation energy for electronic transitions and Ed is the dispersion energy which is a measure of the strength of inter-band optical transitions. This model describes the dielectric response for transitions below the optical gap. It plays an important role in determining the behavior of n1. Figures 8(a) and 8(b) show the optical dispersion behavior of vs. ()2 for the IGZON thin films. The oscillator parameters Eo and Ed are determined by fitting a straight line to the points. The slope of the linear relation represents (EoEd)−1 and the interception with the vertical axis equals to Eo/Ed. The increased values of Eo and Ed as listed in Table 2 indicate the improved structure order of the thin films with Ts and PN2. The static refractive index ns can be determined by[34]

Fig. 8. The (a), (b) (n2 − 1)−1 vs. ()2, (c), (d) χ(1), (e), (f) χ(3), and (g), (h) n2 for IGZON thin films.

The static dielectric constant (εs) is estimated by .[33] It is observed that ns and εs almost increase with Ts and PN2. The refractive index can also be analyzed to determine the average oscillator wavelength (λ0) and oscillator length strength (S0) for the thin films. To obtain these values, the single term Sellmeier oscillator is used as[33]

The λ0 and S0 values are obtained by the linear parts of vs. λ−2 (not shown here), and the results are summarized in Table 2.

It is known that the induced dielectric polarization (P) depends on the applied electrical field (E) which can be expressed in a series of powers of E as[11]

where χ(1), χ(2), and χ(3) represent the linear, second, and third order nonlinear optical susceptibilities, respectively. The refractive index n(λ) can be expressed as[11]

where n1(λ) and n2(λ) are the linear and nonlinear refractive indexes, respectively. The χ(1) and χ(3) are calculated by[11]

where A equals to 1.7 × 10−10 esu. The n2 is calculated by[11]

It is found that both the linear and nonlinear optical properties of the thin films enhance with Ts and PN2 during deposition. The χ(1), χ(3), and n2 all increase and follow the same variation trend of n1(λ) for the improved crystalline and structural order and the increased CN as seen in Figs. 8(c)8(h).

4. Conclusion and perspectives

The increase of Ts and PN2 during sputtering mainly enhances the crystallization which lowers the interfacial crystal potential barrier and therefore increases the µ, Ne, and σ of the IGZON thin films. The S, , τ, le, and Ep are all increase with Ne. The increase of Ts and PN2 enhances the nitrification of the IGZON thin films. The n1, n2, χ(1), and χ(3) all increase with the improved crystallization and nitrification of the thin films. The Eo decreases with the increase of n1. The Ed, λ0, and S0 increase with the increase of n1. The Eg narrows by the increased CN which counteracts the widening effect by the increased Ne.

Reference
[1] Liu P T Chang C H Fuh C S Sze S M 2016 J. Disp. Technol. 12 1070
[2] Huang X M Wu C F Lu H Ren F F Chen D J Zhang R Zheng Y D 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 193505
[3] Raja J Jang K Balaji N Choi W Trinh T T Yi J S 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 083505
[4] Liu P T Chou Y T Teng L F Li F H Fuh C S Shieh H P D 2011 IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 32 1397
[5] Kamiya T Nomura K Hosono H 2010 Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 11 044305
[6] Kamiya T Nomura K Hosono H 2009 J. Disp. Technol. 5 468
[7] Chen X He G Lv J Liu M Wang P Chen X Sun Z 2015 J. Alloy. Compd. 647 1035
[8] Chen X F He G Gao J Zhang J W Xiao D Q Jin P Deng B 2015 J. Alloy Compd. 632 533
[9] Yamazaki S Koyama J Yamamoto Y Okamoto K 2012 Society of Information Display Gigest 183
[10] Djuris A Leung Y 2006 Small 2 944
[11] Larciprete M Centini M 2015 Appl. Phys. Rev. 2 031302
[12] Malik G Jaiswal J Mourya S Chandr R 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 122 143105
[13] Sanal K Vishnu K Shijeesh M R Jayaraj M K 2014 Proc. SPIE 9161 91611B
[14] Shaaban E El-Hagary M Moustafa E Hassan H Ismail Y EmamIsmail M Ali A 2016 Appl. Phys. 122 20
[15] Jilani A Abdel-Wahab M Zahran H Yahia I Al-Ghamdi A 2016 Appl. Phys. 122 862
[16] Wang Y Q Zhu J H Tang W 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 212103
[17] Tang J Deng L Y Tay C B Zhang X H Chai J W Qin H Liu H W Venkatesan T Chua S J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 033111
[18] Lynch D Zhu B Levin B Muller D Ast D Greene R Thompson M 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 262103
[19] Cai P G Zhen D Xu X J Liu Y L Chen N B Wei G R Sui C H 2010 Mater. Sci. Eng. 171 116
[20] Tiwari N Chauhan R Shieh H P D Liu P T Huang Y 2016 IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 63 1578
[21] Sagara P Shishodia P Mehraa R Okada H Wakahara A Yoshida A 2007 J. Lumin. 126 800
[22] Korotcenkov G Brinzari V Ham M 2018 Crystals 8 1
[23] Takagi A Nomura K Ohta H Yanagi H Kamiya T Hirano M Hosono H 2005 Thin Solid Films 486 38
[24] Wang Y Q Zhu J H Tang W 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 212103
[25] Tang J Deng L Y Tay C B Zhang X H Chai J W Qin H Liu H W Venkatesan T Chua S J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 033111
[26] Volintiru I Creatore M Sanden M 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 033704
[27] Cole K S Cole R H 1941 J. Chem. Phys. 9 341
[28] Cole K S Cole R H 1942 J. Chem. Phys. 10 98
[29] Hamberg I Granqvist C 1986 J. Appl. Phys. 60 R123
[30] Tharayila N Sagarb S Raveendrana R Vaidyan A 2007 Physica 399 1
[31] Ryu M Kim T S Son K S Kim H S Park J S Seon J B Seo S J Kim S J Lee E Lee H Jeon S H Han S Lee S Y 2012 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 112
[32] Hamberg I Granqvist C 1986 J. Appl. Phys. 60 R123
[33] Fung T C Chuang C S Nomura K Shieh H P D Hosono H Kanicki J 2008 J. Inform. Disp. 9 21
[34] Yakuphanoglu F Cukurovali A Yilmaz I 2004 Physica 351 53